
At the risk of aging myself, my relationship with reality television began with MTV.
The Real World was my first window into the strange intimacy of watching other people live under observation. Strangers in a house. Confessionals in soft lighting. Arguments that unfolded in real time and then replayed the next day at school or work. It felt raw and revealing and a little bit transgressive. We were being invited into private lives. We were being taught that pressure made good television. We were being trained, slowly, to look without looking away.
By the time America’s Next Top Model arrived, reality television had refined the formula. It offered aspiration and exposure in the same breath. It promised transformation while quietly normalizing humiliation. It told contestants that pressure was preparation, that breakdowns were breakthroughs, that everything unfolding in front of us was necessary for greatness.
And like so many people, I watched. I absorbed it. I believed the narrative that this was mentorship wrapped in entertainment.
The new documentary Reality Check: Inside America’s Next Top Model unsettles that narrative. It doesn’t return us to the glamour or the catchphrases. It returns us to the women themselves and asks what it was like to live inside that machine.
What lingers for me after watching it is not nostalgia. It is anger. And a deep, steady disappointment.
Anger at how clearly harm is named by former contestants. Disappointment at how little accountability meets it.
The documentary gathers women who were very young when they entered the show and invites them to speak now, with years of distance and a language that may not have been available to them at the time. They speak about what it felt like to have their vulnerabilities mined for storyline. What it felt like to be pushed past emotional and physical limits in the name of growth. What it felt like to realize that their personal histories and pain could be shaped into compelling television.
The stories accumulate into a testimony.
Lisa D’Amato reflects on how her childhood trauma was used to construct a persona that made for good television. Dionne Walters describes being placed in a photoshoot that echoed her mother’s real-life shooting, a detail production knew well. Jeana Turner speaks about having her head shaved in a way that stripped something deeply personal from her. Keenyah Hill recounts being sexually harassed during a shoot and being told to manage it herself, to lean on charm rather than receive protection.
And then there is Shandi.
For years, viewers understood her storyline as a cheating scandal. One of the show’s most dramatic episodes. In the documentary, she tells a different story. She speaks about being blacked out drunk. About not being able to consent. About cameras continuing to roll. And that footage later became narrative and spectacle.
It is difficult to sit with that portion of the series and not feel something shift in the body. The distance of time does not soften it. If anything, it sharpens the edges. We know more now about consent and power. We know more about what happens when someone is intoxicated and vulnerable and the people in charge continue filming anyway.
When Tyra Banks is asked about Shandi’s experience, the response is distancing. She remembers her. She offers recognition. And then she explains that production is not her territory.
That moment lands heavily.
Because accountability is not abstract. It is not a concept reserved for when things are tidy and reputations feel secure. It shows itself most clearly when harm is named and responsibility feels inconvenient. Leadership does not dissolve at the first sign of discomfort. You cannot hold vision, authority, and creative control and then step outside of responsibility when the consequences surface.
Intention does not erase impact.
Opportunity does not erase trauma.
Influence does not exempt anyone from accountability.
There are flickers of recognition elsewhere in the documentary. Moments where former judges acknowledge how strange certain challenges now appear. Glimpses of hindsight. But what remains absent is repair. There is no sustained turning toward the contestants that says plainly: we see what happened, we understand that it mattered, we are willing to sit with the impact alongside you.
That absence echoes.
In recovery work, accountability is not about public self-destruction or perfectly worded apologies. It is about staying present when you learn that something you were part of caused harm. It is about resisting the instinct to explain your way out of responsibility. It is about understanding that good intentions and harmful outcomes can live in the same story — and that turning toward the harm does not erase what you hoped to build. It simply tells the truth about the whole of it. Watching Reality Check, I kept returning to the same thought: there was an opportunity here. An opportunity for real conversation. For validation. For changed behavior. For leadership that models what it looks like to listen without retreating.
That opportunity feels largely missed.
The documentary matters because it reveals what happens when intention becomes a shield against impact. When legacy becomes more protected than people. When harm is named and met with distance instead of engagement. It pulls back the curtain on how easily we rationalize what we once accepted as normal entertainment.
What stays with me most is the courage of the contestants who returned to these memories. They did not come back to be entertainment fodder again. They came back to tell the truth about what those years cost them. They came back to place their experiences back into a narrative that once moved forward without their full consent.
Repair is never immediate. Sometimes it begins years after the original harm. Sometimes it begins with a single acknowledgment that lands clean and clear. The women in this documentary have done their part by speaking. What remains is the question of who will meet them there.
Because impact does not disappear with time.
It waits for acknowledgement.
It waits for responsibility.
It waits, still, for repair.

THE MINDFUL BINGE: Mary Cosby Just Taught a Masterclass in Compassion

THE MINDFUL BINGE at The Sober Curator is where we binge-watch and chill—mindfully. In this TV series review section, we don’t just consume shows; we explore their stories, themes, and cultural impact through a sober lens. Using our signature Sobees Scoring System, we rate each pick to help you choose your next watch with intention.
Our digital shelves are neatly organized into Drama, Dramedy, and Reality, making it easy to find your perfect series for a night in.

Resources Are Available
If you or someone you know is experiencing difficulties surrounding alcoholism, addiction, or mental illness, please reach out and ask for help. People everywhere can and want to help; you just have to know where to look. And continue to look until you find what works for you. Click here for a list of regional and national resources.

Follow The Sober Curator on Facebook
What is Reality Check: Inside America’s Next Top Model about?
The documentary revisits the long-running reality series through interviews with former contestants and archival footage, examining both the opportunities it offered and the harm some participants say they experienced.
What kinds of harm do contestants describe?
Former contestants speak about the exploitation of personal trauma, racially and emotionally triggering photo shoots, coercive makeovers, sexual harassment during shoots, and situations involving intoxication and consent that were filmed rather than interrupted.
Why are viewers responding strongly to the documentary?
Audiences now have greater awareness of consent, power dynamics, and mental health, which changes how earlier reality television is understood and evaluated.
How does this connect to recovery work?
Recovery teaches that intentions do not erase impact. Accountability and repair begin with acknowledging harm honestly and remaining present to the experiences of those affected.




